Carbon Farming: “Show Me The Money”

Wednesday, June 13, 2012
“By farmers, for farmers” is our motto. We are farmers. Everything we do and have done in the past 6 years ago to get a market started has been to see farm carbon offsets traded and farmers paid fairly for carbon captured and emissions avoided. Carbon farming is now law. The next task is to make sure farmers will want to get involved. Farmers are saying: “Show Me The Money”. This ‘quick-read report’ tells you about 5 ways we are doing this.

  • The Money Tree – The first CFI activity available to the average farmer is environmental plantings. To make it easier for landholders to come to grips with this opportunity we are working on a guidebook called The Money Tree which translates the ‘meth’* into simple ‘how to’ language. It looks at the CFI planting opportunity as well as other ways to make money from trees on farm. Out soon.

  • Opening the Market – Carbon Farmers of Australia has opened an account on an offsets register (Markit Environmental Registry, a robust global registry to provide transparency and credibility) which enables us to assist landholders to sell their offsets. We have also opened an account with the Carbon Trade Exchange so we can purchase offsets on behalf of organizations wanting to ‘go Carbon Neutral’. And we are applying to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to be registered to provide financial services in emissions units.

  • Soil Carbon Methodology News – Our ‘meth’ has been before the expert panel** and we are working on responding to its requests. We are almost ready to go back to them, once we have nailed the measurement of methane by fitting in with the National Inventory Report methodology (which is designed to report Australia’s National Greenhouse Accounts to the IPCC rather than to measure one farm’s emissions). We are in touch with others working on other soil carbon meths. And we have been told that ‘the Department’ is developing protocols for measurement of soil carbon. (There are at least 3 scientists working on seperate measurement solutions.) It’s the Holy Grail of soil science. There are some fascinating facts about how wool is measured. (See below.***) The most important feature of our meth is the way it uses the wool industry’s solution to a similar problem to ‘defang’ the 100 Year Rule, which we believe removes a major barrier to farmer involvement.

  • Positive List News – For a land management activity (such as bioferts or tillage innovations) to be part of a CFI methodology so farmers can use it to earn offset credits it must first be accepted onto the Positive List. This is a list of activities that the Government has accepted as “Additional” (or capable of producing genuine abatement). If the activity can prove that it is not “common practice” (adopted by less than 5% of farmers in a market or location), it could be accepted for the Positive List (so long as it is not on the Negative List). We are assisting several innovators to prepare their submissions because we believe the more options that farmers have, the more farmers will get involved.

  • Going Carbon Neutral – To help build the market for CFI farm offsets in the voluntary market, we are offering companies wishing to go Carbon Neutral guidance to achieve that goal. Our first client is a bulk haulage company in regional NSW. The process is complex and difficult, but so is everything else to do with the CFI. We have established the baseline, estimated the changes the company will make to reduce emissions, identified the offsets to be purchased to bridge the gap, had a site visit by the verifiers (GHD – one of the world’s leading environmental auditors) and we are responding to their recommendations next week.

  • Don’t Be Put Off – For every negative you might hear about the CFI there is a positive that is not being mentioned. (See an example below.****) The CFI is about innovation which means solutions to problem. The negative voices are not involved in the CFI processes.  The positive are inside the process, making it better.

  • Your Questions – There is a lot to be confused about in the CFI, especially in the “show me the money” issues.. Call 02 6374 0329 or email with your questions.
* A ‘meth’ is a methodology or set of rules a farmer must follow to make money from the CFI.

** The DOIC – Domestic Offsets Integrity Committee. In the period between the return of our meth and our response the Interim DOIC has been replaced by the Permanent DOIC, which has at least three new members who have soil/agricultural expertise, including the Chairman Professor Timothy Reeves an international consultant with expertise in the development and extension of sustainable agricultural productions systems and crop-livestock integration. He is a Professorial Fellow at the Melbourne School of Land and Environment, a director of The Future Farm Industries Cooperative Research Centre, was a Senior Expert for the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and was formerly the Director-General of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre. Professor Lynette Abbott is the Vice Dean of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science and Professor in the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Western Australia. Dr Tony Press was the Director of the Cooperative Research Centre for the Sustainable Development of Australia’s Tropical Savannas.

*** Like carbon in soil, wool is an extremely variable commodity. A 21 micron wool may have a spread of fibres from 11 microns to 37 microns, according to the Australian Wool Testing Authority. “Wool is an extremely variable commodity and wool testing is used to provide an estimate of its properties based on a sample taken from the bulk. Because wool is variable, no two samples are the same.” To overcome the problem buyers would have wit uncertainty, the industry used a statistical device called the Coefficient of Variation of Diameter. It is a measure of the variation in micron measurements along and between individual fibres, relative to the average (or mean) fibre diameter.” The precision of an individual test result is usually expressed in Confidence Limits. Normally, the precision of a test result is defined in terms of 95% Confidence Limits, i.e., the limits on either side of the "true" result within which you can expect 95% of any repeat measurements to lie.

**** You might get the impression from some presentations about the CFI that the odds are you would be paying back offsets you earned because fire wiped out your trees. The facts are these: Between 2001 and 2005, only 2.5% of Australia’s forests were impacted by wildfire each year. The odds are 37 to 1 of a fire event. The majority of wildfires do not kill the trees. The CFI requires that dead trees be replanted. The odds of that happening are far longer than you’d get on a roughie in the first at Randwick next Saturday, not Black Caviar’s @ $1.10, which is the impression given by some presenters. 

Carbon Farming Newsletter: April - May 2012

Friday, May 11, 2012

NEWS FROM THE HUB OF CARBON FARMING!


Your one stop shop to keep up to date and move forward in your carbon farming goals.  

Regional Carbon Market Summit - Leveraging the Carbon Market for regional prosperity


Why is it that all things to do with The Clean Energy Policy, the Land Sector package and the Carbon Farming Initiative are all ‘announced’ in the cities, and discussed at city conferences which cost a fortune to attend? After all, only Landholders can earn carbon credits in the CFI!

This is just not a level playing field, so, we’ve decided to have a Carbon Summit in the Regions on July 25th and 26th! 
We have invited the best knowledge brokers in the business to come to the Regions and help our accountants, solicitors, agribusiness managers, councils, NRM agencies and others to understand HOW to benefit from these new policies, and how to support farmers and landholders who are taking part.

There are Government grants, there are carbon credits to be earned and there are risks and potentials to manage. The inaugural Carbon Market Summit will outline all the issues and answer all questions. It will also hold more extensive training on day two, for those who want to understand what the NEXT STEPS are in getting moving. 

For details, please go to www.regionalcarbonsummit.com.au. This calibre of presenters will not be seen again in the Regions for a very long time.

Breaking news! First round of biodiversity fund announced


Did you have a win? Click here for more details.

Carbon Farming Initiative News


CFI Tree Methodology Approved


So, there is now an approved methodology which has applicability over general farmers/Landholders. The method involves planting of native, bio-diverse trees under the stipulated conditions of the methodology. (The ‘methodology’ is the ‘recipe book’ which describes HOW you must go about things.) We are currently working out how to use their ‘tools’   and we’ll be calling for expressions of interest to hear about how it might work on farm in due course. Stay tuned!

To download the methodology and get used to the ‘Greek’ they are written in click here.

Do you have a new technology or process which has the potential to reduce nitrous oxide from soils, methane from cattle, or sequesters carbon in soil or trees?


If so, you need to apply to go onto the POSITIVE LIST.

The Positive List is for INNOVATORS. And we know there are lots of you! The CFI says that the activity that a Landholder does to earn carbon credits must be ADDITIONAL to what they are doing at the moment. You can apply to be considered additional to business as usual by filling out the Positive List form. A good example is that BIOCHAR is on the list. We are currently assisting some of our best innovators to get their products and processes on this list. Please contact me for assistance in this - even if you are not sure what the heck I’m talking about - it could be important to your business. IT’S A FREE SERVICE!

Click here for more information.

Offset methodologies under consideration


The below is an indication of what will soon happen – LOTS of ways to enter this carbon market. If you can’t see a ‘meth’ you like, wait a bit and one should appear! 

Several carbon offset methodologies are under consideration by the Domestic Offsets Integrity Committee. They are native forest protection, reforestation and afforestation, destruction of methane from piggeries using engineered bio-digesters, management of camels, and three waste-related methodologies.

‘ACCU’ explained  


How are you travelling on understanding the ‘language’ of this new market?  

Well, over the next little while, I’ll be tackling a few explanations for you. While I hope you find them useful, it takes a full day’s training to really understand it to the point of being able to make decisions about your involvement. If you are interested in training, make an enquiry!

So, ACCU - or Australian Carbon Credit Unit - is your ‘currency’. Once you have undertaken a carbon project according to the rules and regulations of the Carbon Farming Initiative, you will apply to be granted a certain number of ACCU’s. These are financial instruments, so serious rules exist around who can and can’t advise you. Once you have ACCU’s, you will be able to sell carbon to polluters, decide when to sell and at what price you want to sell. Sounds great, but it's not that easy to 'earn' them.

The good news is that everything we are hearing at the moment indicates a large demand for them.

NEXT Newsletter - What is a methodology and why do I need one? 

Government information


There is now much more comprehensive information available on the Government site as well. It's worth a look around
They even have a carbon farming handbook now (ours is up to its 4th edition!).

In other news


Revised NCOS released - so what? 


The NCOS (National Carbon Offset Standard) is the Government scheme which allows companies to go carbon neutral. That is to say, they must measure their footprint, reduce it and also purchase carbon credits for any remaining carbon footprint - thereby having a zero footprint. 

Most of the companies will do this voluntarily, for business and personal reasons (see below). The good news for Landholders and Farmers is that they will now be able to buy ACCU’s (Australian Carbon Credit Units - see above) to offset their footprint.

This in effect increases potential demand for your carbon!

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF GOING CARBON NEUTRAL!
Republica Coffee is an Australian organic fair trade business - it is the first food company to be certified carbon neutral by government agency, Low Carbon Australia - these features have helped Republica to generate $4.5 million, win contracts with Jetstar and Virgin, and expand its product range from 1 to 7 with Coles AFR 100412.

More examples next newsletter!  

Rise in N2O emissions due to fertiliser use


A new study has proved definitively that a dramatic rise in atmospheric nitrous oxide in the past 50 years is due to increased fertiliser use. The researchers hope the study will contribute to changes in fertiliser use and agricultural practices to mitigate the release of nitrous oxide into the atmosphere.

Lachlan soil carbon pilot on YouTube


NSW DPI research agronomist Warwick Badgery features in this YouTube clip about the soil carbon pilot project in the Lachlan catchment.

And lastly, some snippets


Tasmanian farmers' push for action on industrial hemp production has won support from all 3 parties in the state - the move is being driven by strong consumer demand for renewable and recyclable fibre products - industrial hemp is already cultivated in Canada (The Mercury 23/03/12).

In an attempt to keep costs down almost one-third of small business owners haven’t taken a holiday since they started business according to a new MYOB report StartUpSmart 170412. Sounds familiar to me! 

Until next time… Go forth and increase carbon storage!    

Any queries, you know where to find us! Email us on louisa@carbonfarmersofaustralia.com.au, contact us through the website or call on 02 6374 0329.  

Is the soil carbon machine pumping 50% more CO2?

Friday, October 14, 2011

Photosynthesis – the process that creates soil carbon – could be taking up almost 50% more CO2 than previously estimated, according to a report in Nature, the British scientific journal. An international team of scientists have reset the bar for CO2 draw down from 120 billion tonnes per year to between 150-175 billion tonne annually… between 25% and 45% increase. This would logically mean the world’s soils have even greater capacity to store carbon. But even though they have no evidence to support the contention, the researchers declare there is no increase in soil carbon sequestration. 

The report's lead researcher Lisa Welp, from the University of California's Scripps Institute of Oceanography, said: “The extra CO2 taken up as photosynthesis is most likely returned right back to the atmosphere via respiration.” The leader of the CSIRO Changing Atmosphere research group, Paul Fraser, said “it doesn't mean they hold more carbon, they (plants) probably respire faster.” “Probably?” “Most likely?” Is this based on evidence? “I'd love to be able to say it does mean that but we just don't know that, that's in the next few steps (of research),” said Dr Fraser. 

There are two possible reactions to the higher rates of photosynthesis. One is to dismiss the possibility that it means good news for those of us who believe soils have the capacity to be a secure bridge to a low carbon future. The other is to accept these findings as further proof that there is a new paradigm that suits the times. Opposition spokesman on climate action, Greg Hunt, is among the latter when he says: “ the scientific evidence has moved more strongly in favour of the enormous potential of land and agriculture-based emissions reductions.” Which do you choose: the past or the future?

Read more.

Science Fiction, for Certain

Friday, April 29, 2011

Measurement.

The key issue with measurement for the purposes of trade is not accuracy but certainty. The buyer needs to know that they are getting at least as much value as they are paying for. Every transaction requires an assessment of risk. There are several ways to manage risk in commerce: accurate measurement where possible and a margin for error based on a high degree of probability where it is not. There are several ways that soil carbon can deliver 95% certainty. But buyers of offsets based on avoided emissions - such as alternative energy - have no guarantee that the tonne of coal that was left in the ground as a result of their purchase will stay there for any length of time. Yet sellers of these offsets are not required to guarantee that this tonne of coal will remain unburned for 100 years.

It can be measured accurately but it can't be guaranteed at even 5% certainty.

The Kyoto Protocol is structurally biased against biosequestration. The 100 year rule has no technical or scientific basis - it was a policy decision. It is not based on the decay profile of a tonne of CO2 as we have been led to believe. The Permanence Requirement is a legal fiction.

The fact that it was even considered for soil carbon proves that either the IPCC was ignorant of agricultural reality or there was a conscious attempt to block agriculture because the architects of Kyoto have a prejudicial view of farmers as climate vandals who should not be rewarded for doing the right thing anyway. The CSIRO's ECOS magazine let slip in September 2010 that 'there is a virtual consensus among scientists' that farmers should need no incentive to build soil carbon. Senior CSIRO scientists have described anyone associated with the trade in carbon farming offsets as ethically challenged. Scientific objectivity is another fiction. The dearth of soil carbon data... who chooses what will be studied and how? How many learned papers appear to prosecute the case against soil carbon? How does the buyer of soil carbon science (us) measure what we get for our money? What does unsound science look like?

It looks the same as sound science to the untrained eye. Policy makers should learn to tell the two apart.

Originally posted by Carbon Coalition Against Global Warming

The Soil Carbon Solution

Sunday, April 17, 2011

The Carbon Farming & Trading Association recommends that the Government extend its policy of giving Agriculture special status in Climate Change policy to grant special status to soil offsets on the grounds that the benefits to the community and the environment are of such a magnitude that to allow accounting rules to deny us them is a perverse outcome of an equal magnitude.

We recommend that a special class of offsets for soil carbon be defined that will enroll as many farmers as possible to sequester as much carbon as possible as fast as possible.

We recommend that, to meet that objective, the 100 year rule be replaced by a range of time frames to allow flexibility.

We recommend that the environmental definition of additionality be adopted, by which all carbon added above the baseline is deemed additional.

We recommend that the common practice test for additionality be abandoned because it contradicts the objective outlined above.

We recommend that the ‘business as usual’ rule, which penalizes Landcare farmers and other progressive landholders who have taken up carbon farming techniques early and rewards laggards who continue to degrade their soils.

We recommend that the offset unit be initially offered on the domestic voluntary market as an interim measure while measurement and other issues are resolved.

We recommend that the Australian Government expand the ambit of its campaign within the IPCC to have the need to account for non-anthropogenic emissions deleted from Article 3.4 into a broader initiative to fashion a regime sympathetic to sectors subject to biological cycles such as Agriculture.

(Originally Posted By Blogger to Carbon Coalition Against Global Warming at 4/13/2011 09:28:00 AM)